NVIDIA H100, H200, B200, B300 and DGX-ready Data Centers

  • We know where GPU infrastructure actually exists, including off-market providers that don’t publish pricing and don’t show up in search. 
  • Tell us your SKU, GPU count, kW per rack, and target market. We send a few qualified colocation matches with real pricing, real availability, and real lead times within hours vs weeks. Free.

    *No, you don’t pay extra, we are not a typical broker.

Get NVIDIA-Ready Quotes. Free
Popular Services
500+

providers, including DGX-Ready and HGX-capable facilities

10k+

client projects since 2004

<24h

turnaround shortlist in your inbox

Free

for you

What We Quote

H100 SXM/PCIe

H200 SXM5 / H200 NVL

HGX H200 (8-GPU) 

DGX H100 / DGX H200

B200 / DGX B200

B300 / DGX B300

GB200 NVL72

L40S 

A100 (legacy refresh)

RTX 6000 Pro / consumer GPU cards (select facilities)

Custom HGX builds

Who We Help (NVIDIA-specific)

Your situationWhat we deliver
AI startup / first HGX nodeYou have 1 HGX H200 node and nowhere to put itMid-tier and regional providers that take single-rack, 10–15kW deployments without ghosting you or quoting hyperscaler minimums.
Scaling AI companyYou’re scaling fast: 8–32× HGX, 4–10 racksLive-capacity matching across 500+ sites. We bypass waitlists by going to unlisted operators who have power available right now.
Neocloud / GPU resellerYou’re a neocloud or GPU reseller at multi-MW scaleWholesale-grade providers and build-to-suit conversations including future capacity reservations.
Research / HPC / universityYou’re running a research or HPC cluster on a grant timelineDGX-Ready facility shortlist with grant-friendly term flexibility, not a 36-month enterprise commitment.
Regulated AI (healthcare, fed, finance)You’re deploying GPU infrastructure in a regulated environmentProviders filtered by compliance certification (current, not 2022 PDFs), physical access controls, and documented audit processes.

AI startup, 16-person team, ordered 3× HGX H200 nodes.

10,000+ client projects since 2004

Quoted by Equinix and 2 Tier-1s: all required 100 kW minimums and 6-month leases. Two regional providers ghosted. 

They came to QuoteColo. We returned matched options in 28 hours, including a Phoenix facility willing to take a single 30 kW cabinet on a 12-month term at $185/kW. Deployed in 5 weeks. ~$74K saved year one vs the cheapest Tier-1 quote.

Why NVIDIA hosting is harder than regular colo

Most colocation facilities were built for 5-10 kW racks. Modern NVIDIA deployments break that envelope on day one. Very few data centers in the world can support even 50 kW per rack without specific infrastructure upgrades. Here’s what actually trips up deployments:

1. Power density wall

A single HGX H200 8-GPU server pulls ~10.2 kW under load. Stack 4 of those in a rack and you’re at ~40 kW — vastly exceeding the 10–12 kW/rack design point of typical retail colocation. B200 systems push that to 14+ kW per server, and Blackwell rack-scale (GB200 NVL72) lands at 120 kW per rack and rising.

2. Cooling and when liquid becomes mandatory

H100 and H200 (700W TDP per GPU) can be air-cooled if the facility has rear-door heat exchangers or aggressive containment. B200 (1,000W) and B300 (1,100–1,400W) require direct-to-chip liquid cooling. No exceptions. If a provider doesn’t already have CDUs (Coolant Distribution Units) plumbed, they’re not a candidate and standing one up takes months.

3. NVLink fabric proximity

Multi-node NVLink/NVSwitch deployments have hard cable-length limits. NVIDIA’s reference designs require leaf switches within ~30 m of GPU pods, and the NVLink scale-out switch caps at ~20 m. This means SuperPOD-class deployments need contiguous racks, not whatever space the colo has spare. Many providers say “we have 4 racks available”, but spread across 3 rows. That kills NVLink scale-out.

4. Network fabric

400G InfiniBand (NDR) or 100G Ethernet minimum for training. Storage and management on a separate fabric. If a colocation can’t deliver 400G to your cabinet at reasonable cross-connect pricing, the rest doesn’t matter.

5. NVIDIA DGX-Ready certification

For DGX systems specifically, NVIDIA maintains a DGX-Ready Colocation partner program. Equinix, Digital Realty, DataBank, and EcoDataCenter are in. Many regional providers aren’t, but can still host non-DGX HGX systems just fine. We help filter both.

Why Most Teams Struggle to Find NVIDIA Colocation

Option A

Google / ChatGPT

You get the same four or five brand names (Equinix, Digital Realty, CoreSite, DataBank). All have NVIDIA-ready pages. Most will quote you a facility that technically exists but can’t deliver 30 kW of liquid-ready capacity on your timeline, and won’t mention the 6-month power queue until after you’ve signed the LOI.

Option B

Directories & Comparison Sites

Outdated inventory, no power availability data, no indication of which facilities actually have CDUs installed versus “liquid-ready on request.” Your inquiry goes to a sales queue. Three weeks later you’re still waiting for a spec sheet.

Option C

Going direct to Tier 1 operators

If you’re deploying 100 kW+, this works — eventually. If you’re deploying one HGX H200 node or a 2-rack B200 cluster, you’ll be told the minimum commitment is 10 racks or 100 kW, and the next available slot is Q2 next year. The facilities that will take a single-rack NVIDIA deployment at 15-40 kW don’t appear in this process at all.

Option D

QuoteColo

Send your SKU, GPU count, kW per rack, and target market. We filter 500+ providers, including regional and off-market operators who fill capacity through referrals rather than search traffic, and return matched options with confirmed power availability, cooling type verified (installed CDUs, not promised ones), all-in pricing, and realistic lead times. Email-first. No calls until you’ve seen the options. Standard NVIDIA requests get a response within 24 hours.

Colocation for HGX B200 & GB300 Racks — From Blackwell to What Comes Next

The GPU generation your facility needs to support has changed faster than most colocation infrastructure has. Six months ago most NVIDIA colocation inquiries specified H100s. Today the question on the first call is ‘can you support Blackwell?’ Here’s the full picture:

 

GenerationGPU SKUWhat buyers ask forRack power demandKey infrastructure shift
2023-24H100AI training clusters20-40 kW/rackAir or RDHx; 400G IB for multi-node
2024-25H200 / HGX H200More memory, same envelope20-40 kW/rackSame envelope as H100; liquid preferred, not mandatory
2025-26B200 / HGX B200 / DGX B200AI factories, reasoning models40-80 kW/rackLiquid cooling mandatory (DLC). CDUs must be installed.
2025-26GB200 / GB200 NVL72Rack-scale AI cluster~120 kW/rack-systemLiquid integrated. 72 GPUs + 36 CPUs per rack. Very few facilities qualify.
2026+B300 / GB300 / DGX B300Reasoning AI, long-context inferenceUp to 100 kW/rack288GB HBM3e memory/GPU. Liquid mandatory. 800G networking.

 

The B300 is Blackwell Ultra. Its 288 GB HBM3e per GPU (vs 192 GB on B200) matters because AI reasoning and long-context inference workloads are increasingly memory-constrained, not compute-constrained. The facilities that can host it need usable kW confirmed against breaker capacity (NEC 80% rule) and CDU infrastructure sized for sustained load, not nameplate.

NVIDIA has already announced the Vera Rubin platform as the next generation after Blackwell, but B300/GB300 is expected to be the dominant deployment platform through 2026 because it’s what customers can actually buy and deploy today.

What Cooling and Power Does My Deployment Actually Need?

Use this to self-qualify before reaching out. Sending specs upfront means we can match you in hours, not days.

 

DeploymentTypical rack powerCoolingWhat we match to
1x GPU server (RTX 6000 / 4090)0.8-7 kWAirFacilities that accept single nodes and consumer cards
8xH200 / B200 node6-15 kWAir or rear-doorHD-capable retail colo, 1-2 cabinets
HGX / DGX B300 rack20-40 kWLiquid preferredLiquid-ready cabinets, metered power
GB300 / multi-rack cluster100 kW+LiquidWholesale + powered-shell providers

Per-SKU technical & deployment reference

PlatformGPU TDP8-GPU server powerPractical rack densityCoolingLead time*Cost-tier (note)
H100 SXM5700 W~10.2 kW~40 kW (4 servers)Air OK / liquid better2–6 weeksMature; broad availability
H200 SXM5700 W~10.2 kW~40 kW (4 servers)Air OK / liquid preferred3–6 weeksSame envelope as H100 — easy retrofit
H200 NVL (PCIe)600 WLower (PCIe)15–25 kWAir-cooled2–4 weeksBest fit for enterprise air-cooled racks
DGX H200700 W10.2 kW per system~40 kW (4 systems)Liquid recommended4–8 weeksDGX-Ready facility preferred
B2001,000 W~14 kW60–80 kW typicalLiquid mandatory (D2C)6–12 weeksTight supply; allocation-driven
B300 (Blackwell Ultra)1,100–1,400 W~14.3 kWUp to 100 kWLiquid mandatory8–14 weeksNewest Hopper successor; limited
GB200 NVL72Per-Superchip~120 kW per rack120–140 kW (rack-scale)Liquid mandatory3–6 months+Hyperscaler-grade; very few sites
L40S350 W~5–7 kW15–25 kWAir-cooled1–3 weeksInference workloads; widely accepted
RTX 6000 Pro / consumer cards300-600W1-7 kW5-20 kWAir-cooled1-3 wksSelect facilities only; ask before assuming acceptance

*Lead times assume hardware is in hand. Power-slotted facilities deploy faster; liquid retrofits

Real pricing: colocation vs cloud

Most published cloud GPU rates look reasonable until you do the year-2 math. H200 on-demand pricing (April 2026):

  •       AWS p5e: ~$4.98/GPU-hr
  •       Azure ND H200 v5: ~$10.60/GPU-hr
  •       GCP a3-ultragpu: ~$10.87/GPU-hr
  •       Specialist clouds (Lambda, RunPod, Jarvislabs): $3.80–$4.00/GPU-hr
  •       Spheron / aggregator floor: ~$4.54/GPU-hr · spot floor ~$0.50/GPU-hr

 

Colo TCO example — 8× H200 (one HGX node), 2-year horizon:

Cost componentCloud (AWS p5e, 80% util)Colocation (own HW)
Compute / hourly burn$4.98 × 8 × 17,520 hrs ≈ $698KHardware: ~$315K once
Power & space (24 mo)Bundled~10–14 kW × $200/kW × 24 ≈ $48–67K
Network / cross-connectsEgress fees can hit $100K+$5–15K
Remote hands / setupN/A$2–5K one-time + as-used
2-year TCO~$800K+~$370–400K all-in

 

Numbers are illustrative. Actual quotes vary by market, term, and provider. Break-even on owned HW typically lands in months 6–9 for steady workloads. Cloud still wins for spiky training. Colo wins for inference at scale.

How It Works

Step 1
Step 1
Tell us your SKU specs

GPU model, count, server form factor (HGX / DGX / PCIe), power per rack, target market(s), term length, and whether you prefer to start with technical specs only.

Step 2
Step 2
We match with providers

We filter for NVIDIA-Ready facilities: power density, cooling type, NVLink-friendly topology, fabric, certifications. We pre-check live capacity, not stale spec sheets.

Step 3
Step 3
You get matched options by email

Real pricing, real lead times, real cross-connect math. You decide. No sales calls until you’ve seen the options.

Quotes within 24 hours for standard NVIDIA requests. A real person follows up, not an automated drip sequence.

Why Choose Us

  • Access to 500+ Hosting Colocation Facilities
  • Get prices within hours vs weeks
  • Trusted Service Since 2004

Get Free Quotes From Providers

Free qualified quotes in your inbox within hours vs weeks. No sales calls until you’re ready.

    Markets: where NVIDIA capacity actually lives in 2026

    In 2026, power availability beats the brand. Ashburn, Dallas, Santa Clara and Chicago are still tight for liquid-ready capacity (3–6 month waitlists for prime space). Plan-B markets where deals close in weeks:

    •       Phoenix / Arizona: Strong power, GPU-ready builds coming online, sub-Ashburn pricing.
    •       Reno / Nevada: Cheap power, low-tax, growing AI/HPC concentration.
    •       Atlanta / Georgia: Good fabric, mid-tier pricing, lots of secondary providers.
    •       Columbus / Ohio: Hyperscaler shadow market; emerging GPU-ready capacity.
    •       Quincy / Central Washington: Hydro power, low PUE, growing GPU presence.
    •       Quebec / Montreal: Low-cost hydro, cool ambient, strong choice for Canadian or compliance-flexible deployments.
    •       Toronto / Ontario: Carrier-rich, enterprise-grade providers, good for AI startups serving the CA market.

     

    If you’re locked to Ashburn or Santa Clara, we’ll tell you what’s actually available and what the wait costs you. If you’re flexible, we’ll show you Plan B and what you save.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Answers about NVIDIA GPU colocation, cooling, pricing, lead times, and deployment planning.

    Will facilities accept consumer GPUs (RTX 4090, RTX 5090, RTX 6000 Pro)?

    Many won’t, and they don’t tell you upfront. Some facilities have AUPs that specifically exclude consumer cards; others have infrastructure calibrated only for server-grade hardware. We know which facilities accept consumer and prosumer cards (RTX 4090/5090, RTX 6000 Pro) so you don’t spend a week on intake forms and emails before hitting a rejection. Tell us your exact card and we route accordingly.

    Air or liquid cooling — and does it matter for my density?

    For H100 and H200 deployments at 10-40 kW per rack, air cooling with containment or rear-door heat exchangers works. For B200 and B300 at 60-100+ kW, liquid (DLC or immersion) is mandatory. We match to air-cooled up to ~15-20 kW per rack and liquid for 30 kW+, so you’re not forced into a cooling model you don’t actually need. If you’re unsure, give us the GPU model and count and we’ll tell you what your hardware requires.

    Do I have to pay for power I’m not using?

    Committed kW is the standard billing model. You reserve a power amount and pay for it whether your hardware uses it or not. For inference workloads that idle most of the month and spike occasionally, this can be a significant overpay. We specifically look for facilities that offer true metered per-kWh billing for variable workloads. They exist, they’re just not the default. Tell us your utilization pattern and we’ll filter for it.

    I only need one server or one rack. Do I even qualify?

    Yes. Most Tier 1 operators now gate small deployments behind 50-100 kW+ minimums. We route to mid-tier and regional facilities that take single-node and 1-2 cabinet GPU deployments without those minimums. The regional providers with available capacity for small NVIDIA deployments fill it through referrals, not public listings. That’s the inventory we access.

    How much does NVIDIA H100 or H200 colocation cost?

    Real ranges (2026): $150-$250 per kW/month for power-only retail colo, plus $1,200-$3,500/rack/month for space and standard cross-connects. An 8x H200 HGX node (10.2 kW) typically lands at $2,500-$5,000/month all-in for power, space, and basic network in mid-tier markets. Prime markets (Ashburn, Santa Clara) run 20-40% higher. Liquid-cooled space adds $1,000-$2,000/rack premium. We send a few qualified options based on your specs, not generic ranges.

    Do I need liquid cooling for H100 or H200?

    No, not strictly. H100 and H200 (700W TDP per GPU, ~10.2 kW per HGX node) can be air-cooled in facilities with rear-door heat exchangers or proper hot/cold aisle containment. Liquid is preferred for performance and density but not mandatory. For B200 (1,000W) and B300 (1,100-1,400W), direct-to-chip liquid cooling is mandatory — both for thermal reasons and to maintain NVIDIA’s warranty terms.

    What’s the lead time for NVIDIA GPU colocation in 2026?

    Air-cooled H100/H200 in power-slotted facilities: 2-6 weeks. Liquid-cooled B200/B300 in prime markets (Ashburn, Santa Clara): 3-6 months. Plan-B markets (Phoenix, Atlanta, Reno, Columbus): often 4-8 weeks even for liquid. GB200 NVL72 hyperscale racks: 3-6 months minimum. We track live capacity — the difference between a ‘qualified’ provider and one with actual power on the floor right now is what saves you 60+ days.

    Is colocation cheaper than AWS / Azure / GCP for H200?

    For steady inference and long-running training, yes — typically 40-60% lower 24-month TCO if you own the hardware. AWS p5e at ~$4.98/GPU-hr x 8 GPUs x 80% utilization is ~$700K over 2 years. Same workload on owned H200s in colo: ~$370-400K all-in. Cloud still wins for spiky, short-burst training. Hybrid (train cloud, infer colo) is the sweet spot most teams land on.

    What’s an HGX H200 vs DGX H200 vs H200 NVL?

    HGX H200 is NVIDIA’s reference 8-GPU baseboard that OEMs (Supermicro, Dell, Lenovo, ASUS) build into servers. DGX H200 is NVIDIA’s own complete system. Both pull ~10.2 kW per 8-GPU node, both prefer liquid but tolerate air, both want NVLink-friendly rack topology. H200 NVL is the PCIe variant: lower power (600W), air-cooled, fits standard enterprise racks at 15-25 kW.

    What’s a DGX-Ready data center? Do I need one?

    NVIDIA’s DGX-Ready Colocation program certifies facilities meeting NVIDIA’s standards for DGX systems. Members include Equinix, Digital Realty, DataBank, and EcoDataCenter. You don’t strictly need a DGX-Ready facility unless NVIDIA support or warranty terms require it, but it’s a useful filter for AI-grade infrastructure quality. Many non-DGX-Ready providers host HGX-based systems just fine and often cheaper.

    Can a colocation accept just one HGX H200 server, or do they require a full rack?

    Most prime-market providers won’t take less than a full rack or a 100 kW commitment. Mid-tier and regional providers will take a single 10-15 kW cabinet on 12-month terms. We specifically maintain relationships with operators who accept small-footprint GPU deployments — a major reason single-node AI startups come to us instead of cold-calling Equinix.

    What network / fabric do I need for multi-node H200 training?

    400 Gbps InfiniBand (NDR) is standard for H200 multi-node training. 800 Gbps (NDR800) for B200/B300. Storage and management traffic should live on a separate 100/200G Ethernet fabric. NVLink scale-out has cable-length limits (~20-30m), so you need contiguous racks.

    What kW per rack do I need to plan for?

    H100/H200 HGX: 30-40 kW/rack. H200 NVL (PCIe): 15-25 kW/rack. B200: 60-80 kW/rack. B300: up to 100 kW/rack. GB200 NVL72: 120 kW per rack-scale unit. Always provision for peak draw, not average — training workloads sustain near-max for hours.

    Does QuoteColo charge me anything?

    No. We’re free to you. Providers share their existing sales commission with us, the same way they’d pay an in-house salesperson. You pay exactly what you’d pay going direct, and we save you the weeks of sales calls.

    Why not just use ChatGPT or Google to find a provider?

    Most providers don’t publish real pricing, and the ones that do quote list prices that the real bill rarely matches (cross-connect fees, power overage tiers, install fees). ChatGPT doesn’t know who has 30 kW of liquid-ready capacity in Phoenix this week. We do because we’re actively calling them.

    Can you help with B200, B300, or GB200 NVL72 deployments?

    Yes. Most of our active conversations in 2026 involve B200 and B300 deployments. GB200 NVL72 is hyperscale-grade — fewer facilities qualify, lead times are 3-6 months minimum, and most deals are off-market. We have relationships with the operators that take these. Send specs and we’ll be straight about timelines.

    What if I just bought hardware and don’t know my power profile yet?

    Send us the SKU and quantity. We’ll back into the kW for you and confirm before quoting. Common mistake: people use nameplate wattage from the sales sheet, but real workload draw is often 70-85% of that. We size for sustained peak, which is what providers bill against.

    X