(888) 400-5732
(888) 400-5732
Contact Us

Compare Data Centers & Prices in Chicago

Chicago’s data center market runs deep: carrier hotels, financial-grade facilities, and regional operators that rarely appear in a standard search.
We work with providers here that will quote based on your technical requirements first, no company intake required.

Chicago Prices

1 to 2U (1-3Amp 120v, 1-5TB)
24U – 2 to 3kW & 100M to GIGe (+)
Standard Density 48U – 2 to 5kW & 100M to GIGe (+)
High Density 48U – 10 to 17kW (3ph) & 1M to GIGe (+)
Standard 4 rack private cage, 5kW per rack & GIGe (+)
High Density 4 rack private cage, 20kW per rack & GIGe (+)
Chicago
$124 – $143
$1045 – $1425
$1425 – $1781
$2375 – $4940
$5225 – $5700
$15200 – $19000

Prices may change, to clarify the price leave a request

Compare prices in Chicago with nearby cities and states

1 to 2U (1-3Amp 120v, 1-5TB)
24U – 2 to 3kW & 100M to GIGe (+)
Standard Density 48U – 2 to 5kW & 100M to GIGe (+)
High Density 48U – 10 to 17kW (3ph) & 1M to GIGe (+)
Standard 4 rack private cage, 5kW per rack & GIGe (+)
High Density 4 rack private cage, 20kW per rack & GIGe (+)
Virginia
$103 – $238
$818 – $1045
$1425 – $1781
$2375 – $4940
$5463 – $5938
$15200 – $21375
Dallas
$124 – $238
$1045 – $1425
$664 – $1781
$712 – $4465
$4038 – $5700
$13300 – $17100
Atlanta
$124 – $238
$1045 – $1425
$1425 – $1781
$2375 – $4940
$5225 – $5700
$15200 – $19000

*Prices change every week. Request a quote to get accurate prices. We’ll tell you honestly if Chicago is the right fit or if another market improves TCO without hurting reach or resiliency

High-Density / GPU / AI / HPC Colocation Pricing from our providers (Chicago – ballpark ranges)

Deployment type (keywords)Typical usable powerTypical fitChicago ballpark pricing
High density colocation cabinet8-12 kWdense compute / storage$140-$245 per kW/mo
GPU colocation (inference rack)12-20 kWGPU inference, analytics$160-$285 per kW/mo
AI / HPC colocation (“hot rack”)20-30+ kWHPC, AI training pods (small)$205-$345+ per kW/mo
Small GPU row (2-6 racks)60-150 kW totalhigher-power retailcustom quote

*Prices from our providers change every week. Request a quote to get accurate prices. Chicago often wins when buyers want a central market with deep infrastructure and strong connectivity options.

*If a provider cannot define usable kW, cooling class, and how A/B power changes capacity, the quote is not truly comparable.

**Your real monthly bill will be higher than the base quote (here’s why) In Chicago, carrier-rich environments, cross-connect structure, and support policy can change the total more than the first cabinet number suggests.

Example: 20kW GPU rack (high density / AI inference)

Base power: 20 kW x $235/kW = $4,700/mo

Cooling and power design still move the real $/kW band materially

Network and connectivity often add $900-$2,600+/mo

Cross-connects and remote hands policy can widen the spread further

Realistic total: $6,300-$9,300+/mo in many Chicago deployments.

That is why we normalize all-in monthly cost instead of comparing only the base cabinet quote.

Chicago wins on central reach.

For a lot of deployments, Chicago is less about hype and more about practical network geography. It keeps appearing in serious shortlists because it can solve reach, carrier access, and production-scale infrastructure in one market.

  • Some teams want Chicago for central U.S. positioning and stronger interconnection options
  • Others are pricing high-density colocation and need to know which facilities really support hotter rack profiles
  • And many simply need an honest comparison between Chicago, Virginia, Dallas, and other core markets before signing a long-term deal

We make that easier by returning a smaller, qualified list of Chicago colocation providers with pricing, availability, and deployment notes matched to your actual requirements.

Request Custom Quote
Bob Spiegel, CEO at www.quotecolo.com

How It Works

Step 1
Step 1
Submit Your Request

Share your specific needs (e.g., power, location, etc.).

Step 2
Step 2
Get Quotes Quickly

Connect with Bob (or sales) via email or phone to review your specifications. Clients will receive immediate provider contacts and pricing.

Step 3
Step 3
Make An Informed Decision

Multiple qualified providers will connect with you directly. You decide on which option is best for organization. There is no obligation.

What you’ll receive from us

  • Shortlist of Chicago facilities that fit (metro core, carrier-rich options, and central/east comparisons)
  • Quote matrix (upon request) (kW, RU, A/B power, x-connects, bandwidth model, SLA, contract term)
  • Density notes (upon request) on cooling fit, growth headroom, and deployment risks
  • Alternative market recommendation if Chicago is close but another market lands better commercially

Why Choose Us

  • Access to 500+ Hosting Colocation Facilities
  • Get prices within hours vs weeks
  • Trusted Service Since 2004
Quotecolo, Llc
4.8
powered by Google
See All Google Reviews

Get Free Quotes From Providers

Free qualified quotes in your inbox within hours vs weeks. No sales calls until you’re ready.

    500+ Colocation Providers in Our Network worldwide

    From global brands to highly competitive regional datacenters that rarely show up in ChatGPT and Google searches. We help you compare both – and often uncover better pricing and faster availability.
    Talk to us to find your best option

    Chicago Colocation Data Centres

    Data CenterProviderCityStateAddressKey Features
    Digital Realty 350 E Cermak (ORD10)Digital RealtyChicagoIllinois350 E Cermak RdPremier Midwest carrier hotel & interconnection hub
    Digital Realty 600 S Federal (ORD11)Digital RealtyChicagoIllinois600 S Federal StDowntown enterprise colocation
    Digital Realty Elk Grove CampusDigital RealtyElk Grove VillageIllinoisBusse Rd1.1M+ sq ft multi-building campus
    Digital Realty Franklin Park CampusDigital RealtyFranklin ParkIllinoisGrand Ave500,000+ sq ft, 40-acre campus
    Digital Realty NorthlakeDigital RealtyNorthlakeIllinoisN Railroad AveEnterprise colocation facility
    CoreSite CH1CoreSiteChicagoIllinois427 S LaSalle StDowntown carrier hotel
    CoreSite CH2CoreSiteChicagoIllinois1432 S Clinton St353,000+ sq ft, 65+ network providers
    Equinix Cermak CampusEquinixChicagoIllinois350 E Cermak RdGlobal interconnection platform
    Equinix Elk Grove CampusEquinixElk Grove VillageIllinoisLunt AveCarrier-neutral campus near O’Hare
    NTT Chicago CampusNTT DATAItascaIllinoisPierce Rd72 MW campus supporting AI & hyperscale
    CyrusOne CHI5CyrusOneLombardIllinoisSpringer DrEnterprise colocation
    CyrusOne Aurora III CampusCyrusOneAuroraIllinoisBilter RdPlanned 40 MW hyperscale campus
    Prime Chicago CampusPrime Data CentersElk Grove VillageIllinoisHiggins Rd / Midway Ct180 MW hyperscale campus
    DataBank ORD1DataBankChicagoIllinois600 S Federal StDowntown carrier hotel
    DataBank ORD2DataBankChicagoIllinois840 S Canal StEnterprise colocation
    DataBank ORD3DataBankMt. ProspectIllinoisBusiness Center DrO’Hare enterprise facility
    DataBank ORD4DataBankOak BrookIllinoisSwift Dr86,000 sq ft Tier III facility
    T5 Chicago CampusT5 Data CentersElk Grove VillageIllinoisInnovation DrEnterprise campus near O’Hare
    T5 Chicago IIIT5 Data CentersNorthlakeIllinoisGrand AveEnterprise expansion
    T5 Grayslake CampusT5 Data CentersGrayslakeIllinoisAlleghany RdPlanned 480 MW hyperscale campus
    STACK CHI01 CampusSTACK InfrastructureElk Grove VillageIllinoisTouhy Ave40 MW campus with 7 on-site carriers
    STACK CHI02STACK InfrastructureElk Grove VillageIllinoisJarvis AvePlanned 36 MW expansion
    Stream Chicago CampusStream Data CentersElk Grove VillageIllinoisBusse Rd / Landmeier RdHyperscale campus with 260 MW planned
    EdgeConneX Chicago CampusEdgeConneXElk Grove VillageIllinoisNicholas Blvd / Lunt AveCarrier-neutral edge campus
    CloudHQ ORD CampusCloudHQMt. ProspectIllinoisAlgonquin RdThree-building, 252 MW campus
    Aligned Chicago CampusAligned Data CentersNorthlakeIllinoisNorthwest AveHyperscale campus
    QTS Chicago 1QTSChicagoIllinoisAshland AveEnterprise & hyperscale colocation
    Iron Mountain CHI-1Iron MountainDes PlainesIllinoisTouhy AvePlanned 315,000 sq ft, 36 MW facility
    H5 Data Centers ChicagoH5 Data CentersChicagoIllinoisHastings St36 MW enterprise campus
    TierPoint Chicago WestTierPointFranklin ParkIllinoisGrand AveDRaaS & managed services
    TierPoint Chicago PolkTierPointChicagoIllinoisW Polk StDowntown carrier hotel
    Serverfarm CH1ServerfarmChicagoIllinoisS Canal StFinancial district connectivity
    Summit ChicagoSummitChicagoIllinois350 E Cermak RdEnterprise colocation
    ColoCrossing CH1ColoCrossingElk Grove VillageIllinoisBusse Rd2N+1 enterprise facility
    Cogent ChicagoCogentChicagoIllinoisLaSalle / Jackson / 40th StCarrier-neutral colocation
    Hivelocity ChicagoHivelocityChicagoIllinoisCermak / Wells StEnterprise colocation
    Lumen ChicagoLumenChicago MetroIllinoisMultiple locationsCarrier-neutral enterprise facilities
    Element Critical ChicagoElement CriticalWood DaleIllinoisEdgewood AveHybrid infrastructure
    Metro Edge IMD1Metro EdgeChicagoIllinoisHastings StIllinois Medical District
    Skybox Chicago ISkybox DatacentersElk Grove VillageIllinoisDevon Ave10-acre campus
    HydraVaultHydraVaultChicagoIllinoisWabash AveAI & HPC optimized
    GigeNETGigeNETArlington HeightsIllinoisAlgonquin RdEnterprise hosting & colocation
    Microsoft Elk Grove CampusMicrosoftElk Grove VillageIllinoisInnovation DrHyperscale cloud campus
    Microsoft Hoffman Estates CampusMicrosoftHoffman EstatesIllinoisLakewood BlvdMulti-building campus
    Microsoft NorthlakeMicrosoftNorthlakeIllinoisNorthwest AveAzure region infrastructure
    Meta DeKalb CampusMetaDeKalbIllinoisMetaverse WayLarge hyperscale AI campus
    Compass Hoffman EstatesCompass DatacentersHoffman EstatesIllinoisBeverly RdFormer Sears HQ hyperscale campus
    Edged Chicago CampusEdged EnergyAuroraIllinoisBilter RdSustainable AI-ready campus
    Connect ChicagoOppidanCarol StreamIllinoisKehoe Blvd90,000 sq ft facility
    Related Digital CampusRelated DigitalChicagoIllinoisLake Shore DrPlanned 1 GW hyperscale campus
    Hillwood Joliet Technology CenterHillwood / PowerHouseJolietIllinoisRowell RdPlanned 1.8 GW hyperscale campus
    Morris Technology ParkTractMorrisIllinoisUS-6Planned 1 GW campus
    KARIS Hoffman EstatesKARIS CriticalHoffman EstatesIllinoisHiggins RdProposed hyperscale campus
    KARIS DeKalb CampusKARIS CriticalDeKalbIllinoisGurler RdSeven-building development

    Case studies

    Helped 750+ companies in 20+ years

    From startups colocating their first servers to companies deploying multi-rack, high-density GPU and AI colocation infrastructure, businesses trust QuoteColo to find the right data center faster.

    See how we helped teams secure colocation with the right power, pricing, and providers.

    View our case studies
    Case studies
    Multiple Location Colocation The Pairing Service

    Why QuoteColo (how we simplify Chicago colo)

    Independent market view

    We tell you when Chicago is the right central-market answer and when another metro beats it on economics or topology.

    Requirement filtering

    We filter by power, density, carriers, budget, resiliency, and deployment timing before you start taking calls.

    Quotes quickly

    You get side-by-side pricing and terms in your inbox, usually within a few hours.

    Commercial clarity

    Clients often save 10-15% because we normalize all-in cost instead of comparing only rack headlines.

    No obligation

    Our service is free and you decide whether any option deserves a next step.

    How buyers lose time shopping Chicago colocation

    1

    Scenario 1 – Assume the most connected facility is automatically the best deal

    Carrier-rich buildings can be the right answer, but they can also hide the largest deltas in recurring cross-connect and support costs.

    2

    Scenario 2 – Compare only top-line cabinet quotes

    This is where network structure, cross-connects, and support charges start changing the real monthly bill.

    3

    Scenario 3 – Start with a broker-led market scan

    One requirements email in, a tighter list of real Chicago options out, plus context on whether Virginia, Dallas, or another market is the better fit.

    Typical Chicago Colocation Deployments

    Enterprise production workloads

    Deployments that want a strong central market with serious infrastructure depth and useful network positioning

    GPU / AI infrastructure

    Hotter racks where buyers need clear answers on usable kW, cooling class, and deployment readiness

    Multi-rack growth footprints

    Projects that want room to scale in a market that often balances connectivity and commercial practicality well

    Regional recovery / secondary sites

    Teams that like Chicago for regional diversity, central reach, or operational practicality

    What Most Chicago Datacenter Quotes Don’t Show Upfront

    Chicago often looks strong on paper, but total monthly cost depends on the line items that show up after the first quote:

    Note: We annotate these items so you compare real monthly spend, not just a clean-looking first quote.

    • Cross-connect recurring fees
    • Network billing model differences
    • Cooling and density restrictions
    • Remote hands minimums
    • Power overage billing
    • After-hours rates
    • Install charges

    Is Chicago a smart colo market?

    • Great fit if: you want a strong central U.S. location with deep infrastructure, useful carrier options, and practical reach across multiple regions.
    • Why buyers like it: Chicago often works for production workloads, growth footprints, and multi-market deployments that benefit from a central network position.
    • Best comparison set: benchmark Chicago against Virginia, Dallas, and Atlanta before you commit.

     

    What a good broker does (and doesn’t do):

    How 1U colocation, 20U-22U cabinets, full 40U deployments, private cages, and multi-rack footprints behave differently once network, density, and support costs are included

     

    Which facilities are truly available now and which ones only look attractive because the building is well-known

     

    Whether Chicago is the best central-market answer or simply one option inside a wider national comparison set

    Popular Providers Snapshot (Chicago footprint)

    • Chicago-centered operators: Usually the core of the search because the metro has deep supply and some of the strongest connectivity options in the region.
    • High-density capable facilities: Important when the project includes GPU, AI, or hotter-than-average rack profiles.
    • Comparison markets: We often benchmark Virginia, Dallas, and Atlanta to show where Chicago wins and where it does not.

    We surface both well-known operators and harder-to-find regional options, then narrow them down by practical fit rather than branding alone.

    Chicago Market Map: Where to Land & Why

    Chicago core

    Usually the center of gravity for Illinois colocation because that is where the metro’s deepest infrastructure and commercial range sit.

    Carrier-rich environments

    Useful when the deployment cares about interconnection options and more complex network topologies.

    Central-market benchmarks

    Worth checking if you want to compare central reach and cost across the most common alternatives.

    National comparison set

    Virginia and Dallas often become the clearest benchmarks when Chicago is under review.

    Chicago Datacenter Market Conditions (2026-2027)

    Chicago remains active because it combines central geography, strong interconnection potential, and serious infrastructure depth.

    Enterprise workloads keep looking for central locations with strong network reach

    GPU and AI projects continue to push harder on usable power and truthful cooling specs

    Multi-market production and recovery strategies still keep Chicago on a lot of serious shortlists

    That combination keeps the metro relevant across both cost-driven and network-driven buying cycles

    As a result:

    Power-rich capacity still deserves early validation

    Carrier-rich environments and cross-connect structure can change the total monthly bill more than buyers expect

    Small footprints like 1U colocation or 20U-22U cabinets often need a different shortlist than larger 40U, private cage, or multi-rack deployments

    High-density buyers should validate real cooling and usable kW early instead of relying on generic language

    We track which Chicago facilities:

    Have practical near-term power capacity

    Can deploy in reasonable timeframes

    Are flexible on terms or motivated to win business

    That visibility is difficult to get if you approach each operator separately.

    Who Uses Our Chicago Colocation Service?

    Company type / industryTypical Chicago use caseTypical scaleTypical densityWhat they care about most
    Enterprise IT teamsProduction infrastructure in a strong central market with useful national reach5-40 racks6-15 kW/rackRedundancy, budget control, predictable operations
    AI / GPU teamsHigher-density infrastructure where cooling truth and usable kW matter more than marketing language4-20 racks12-30+ kW/rackCooling design, power clarity, all-in monthly economics
    SaaS / platform operatorsCore application infrastructure with strong central reach and serious connectivity options4-25 racks6-12 kW/rackNetwork spend, support quality, expansion path
    MSPs / managed hostingCustomer-facing workloads that need a reliable central market with strong interconnection options10-60 racks6-12 kW/rackMargin control, support responsiveness, room to grow
    Recovery / secondary site buyersCentral diversification, national reach, or multi-market resiliency planning3-20 racks4-12 kW/rackDisaster profile, cost, operational simplicity
    Financial / infrastructure softwareHigh-availability services in a major central market with disciplined operating processes5-25 racks6-12 kW/rackUptime, security posture, predictable support
    Web3 / distributed infraAlways-on infrastructure where balanced economics and central reach matter more than market prestige4-30 racks8-20 kW/rackPower stability, remote hands response, cost discipline

    FAQ: Chicago Colocation (Traditional + High-Density GPU / AI / HPC)

    How fast can I get Chicago options without weeks of sales calls?

    If your requirements are clear, we can usually start with email-first quotes and only introduce calls once there are a couple of finalists worth pursuing.

    Is Chicago mainly a connectivity market or a cost market?

    Usually both matter, but connectivity and central geography are a big part of why buyers keep Chicago on the shortlist even when they compare lower-cost markets.

    Can you help with smaller deployments (2U-10U)?

    Yes. We can identify providers that will seriously quote smaller footprints instead of forcing oversized minimums.

    How fast can we deploy?

    Typical installs land in the 2-6 week range, depending on power, network, and whether the deployment is standard or higher density.

    Do brokers increase my price? Is QuoteColo free?

    In many colo deals, providers already budget for commissions. The practical benefit is that we normalize all-in cost and keep you from comparing incomplete quotes.

    Do you only work in Chicago?

    No. We cover 500+ datacenters nationwide, but Chicago is one of the markets buyers often compare when they want a strong central location with deep connectivity options.

    Can I place a single GPU rack in Chicago (12-25 kW) without taking a whole suite?

    Sometimes, yes. The key is verifying usable kW, cooling class, and whether the facility will support your rack profile in writing.

    What info do you need to quote Chicago colocation accurately, especially for high density?
    • Cabinet count + size (42U/45U/48U) and weight
    • Target usable kW per rack (and peak draw)
    • A/B required? (yes/no)
    • Cooling requirement (air/containment/RDHx/liquid-ready)
    • Network: port speed + billing model preference + estimated throughput
    • Number of cross-connects (carriers/cloud/private)
    • Timeline + contract term preference