(888) 400-5732
(888) 400-5732
Contact Us

Compare Data Centers & Prices in Minnesota

Minnesota usually enters the shortlist when buyers want a practical Upper Midwest market with Minneapolis-led supply, disciplined economics, and room to compare against larger hubs without paying for prestige alone.
We help you compare Minnesota colocation options by power, rack count, A/B design, carriers, density, budget, and deployment timing. You get a short vendor-neutral list with pricing and terms fast.

Minnesota Prices

1 to 2U (1-3Amp 120v, 1-5TB)
24U – 2 to 3kW & 100M to GIGe (+)
Standard Density 48U – 2 to 5kW & 100M to GIGe (+)
High Density 48U – 10 to 17kW (3ph) & 1M to GIGe (+)
Standard 4 rack private cage, 5kW per rack & GIGe (+)
High Density 4 rack private cage, 20kW per rack & GIGe (+)
Minneapolis
$285 – $475
$1140 – $1378
$1425 – $1710
$2375 – $4940
$5225 – $5700
$15675 – $21375

Prices may change, to clarify the price leave a request

Compare prices in Minnesota with nearby cities and states

1 to 2U (1-3Amp 120v, 1-5TB)
24U – 2 to 3kW & 100M to GIGe (+)
Standard Density 48U – 2 to 5kW & 100M to GIGe (+)
High Density 48U – 10 to 17kW (3ph) & 1M to GIGe (+)
Standard 4 rack private cage, 5kW per rack & GIGe (+)
High Density 4 rack private cage, 20kW per rack & GIGe (+)
Chicago
$124 – $143
$1045 – $1425
$1425 – $1781
$2375 – $4940
$5225 – $5700
$15200 – $19000
Iowa
$285 – $475
$1140 – $1378
$1425 – $1710
$2375 – $4940
$5225 – $5700
$15675 – $21375
Dallas
$124 – $238
$1045 – $1425
$664 – $1781
$712 – $4465
$4038 – $5700
$13300 – $17100

*Prices change every week. Request a quote to get accurate prices. We’ll tell you honestly if Minnesota is the right fit or if another market improves TCO without hurting regional reach or resilience

High-Density / GPU / AI / HPC Colocation Pricing from our providers (Minnesota – ballpark ranges)

Deployment type (keywords)Typical usable powerTypical fitMinnesota ballpark pricing
High density colocation cabinet8-12 kWdense compute / storage$125-$215 per kW/mo
GPU colocation (inference rack)12-20 kWGPU inference, analytics$150-$265 per kW/mo
AI / HPC colocation (hot rack)20-30+ kWAI training pods, HPC, heavier accelerator stacks$190-$320+ per kW/mo
Small GPU row (2-6 racks)60-150 kW totalhigher-power retailcustom quote

*Prices from our providers change every week. Request a quote to get accurate prices. Minnesota often lands well when buyers want an Upper Midwest market with practical economics and a Minneapolis-led supply base that deserves a fair comparison against larger metros.

*If a provider cannot clearly define usable kW, cooling class, and how A/B changes deliverable capacity, the quote is not truly comparable.

**Your real monthly bill will be higher than the base quote (here’s why) In Minnesota, network design, support scope, and cross-connect structure can change the total more than the first cabinet number suggests.

Example: 20kW GPU rack (high density / AI inference)

Base power: 20 kW x $215/kW = $4,300/mo

Cooling design and actual high-density readiness still move the effective $/kW band materially

Network and connectivity often add $800-$2,200+/mo

Cross-connect recurring charges and remote hands policy widen the spread further

Realistic total: $5,700-$8,700+/mo in many Minnesota deployments.

That is why we normalize all-in monthly cost instead of comparing only the first cabinet quote.

Minnesota makes sense when the deployment wants Upper Midwest logic without defaulting to the loudest markets first.

Minnesota is rarely chosen by habit. It gets chosen when a buyer actually compares markets instead of assuming bigger is automatically better.

  • Some teams want Minneapolis-led supply because it offers practical Upper Midwest geography and a more disciplined cost profile than larger hubs.
  • Others are pricing high-density colocation and need a clean answer on usable kW, cooling fit, and whether Minnesota is the right technical home.
  • Many simply need an honest comparison between Minnesota, Chicago, Iowa, Michigan, and Dallas before they commit.

We make that easier by returning a shorter, qualified list of Minnesota colocation providers with pricing, availability, and deployment notes aligned to your actual requirements.

Request Custom Quote
Bob Spiegel, CEO at www.quotecolo.com

How It Works

Step 1
Step 1
Submit Your Request

Share your specific needs (e.g., power, location, etc.).

Step 2
Step 2
Get Quotes Quickly

Connect with Bob (or sales) via email or phone to review your specifications. Clients will receive immediate provider contacts and pricing.

Step 3
Step 3
Make An Informed Decision

Multiple qualified providers will connect with you directly. You decide on which option is best for organization. There is no obligation.

What you’ll receive from us

  • Shortlist of Minnesota facilities that fit (Minneapolis-led supply, state-level alternatives, and Upper Midwest comparison markets when relevant)
  • Quote matrix (upon request) (kW, RU, A/B power, x-connects, bandwidth model, SLA, contract term)
  • Density notes (upon request) on cooling fit, deployment realism, and what actually changes monthly cost
  • Alternative market recommendation if Minnesota is close but another Midwest market lands better commercially

Why Choose Us

  • Access to 500+ Hosting Colocation Facilities
  • Get prices within hours vs weeks
  • Trusted Service Since 2004
Quotecolo, Llc
4.8
powered by Google
See All Google Reviews

Get Free Quotes From Providers

Free qualified quotes in your inbox within hours vs weeks. No sales calls until you’re ready.

    500+ Colocation Providers in Our Network worldwide

    From global brands to highly competitive regional datacenters that rarely show up in ChatGPT and Google searches. We help you compare both – and often uncover better pricing and faster availability.
    Talk to us to find your best option

    Case studies

    Helped 750+ companies in 20+ years

    From startups colocating their first servers to companies deploying multi-rack, high-density GPU and AI colocation infrastructure, businesses trust QuoteColo to find the right data center faster.

    See how we helped teams secure colocation with the right power, pricing, and providers.

    View our case studies
    Case studies
    Multiple Location Colocation The Pairing Service

    Why QuoteColo (how we simplify Minnesota colo)

    Independent market view

    We tell you when Minnesota is the right Upper Midwest answer and when another market beats it on economics, density, or network logic.

    Requirement filtering

    We filter by power, density, carriers, budget, resilience, and deployment timing before you start chasing operators.

    Quotes quickly

    You get side-by-side pricing and terms in your inbox, usually within a few hours.

    Commercial clarity

    Clients often save 10-15% because we normalize all-in cost instead of comparing only the headline cabinet rate.

    No obligation

    Our service is free and you decide whether any option deserves a next step.

    How buyers lose time shopping Minnesota colocation

    1

    Scenario 1 – Assume every Upper Midwest deployment should go to the largest market first

    That usually means Minnesota is dismissed before pricing, geography, and deployment fit are actually compared.

    2

    Scenario 2 – Compare only top-line cabinet quotes

    This is where network, cross-connects, and support structure begin to distort the real monthly bill.

    3

    Scenario 3 – Start with a broker-led market scan

    One requirements email in, a tighter list of real Minnesota options out, plus context on whether Chicago, Iowa, Michigan, Dallas, or Minnesota is the better fit.

    Typical Minnesota Colocation Deployments

    Enterprise production workloads

    Deployments that want a practical Upper Midwest market, strong regional reach, and commercial discipline without defaulting to larger hubs.

    GPU / AI infrastructure

    Hotter rack projects where buyers need clear answers on usable kW, cooling class, and whether the building can actually support the profile.

    Multi-rack growth footprints

    Teams scaling past one cabinet that want an Upper Midwest market with sensible economics and room to compare against larger metros.

    Regional recovery / secondary sites

    Projects that like Minnesota for Minneapolis-led supply, regional diversification, or a practical state-level option inside a broader Midwest design.

    What Most Minnesota Datacenter Quotes Don’t Show Upfront

    Minnesota can look straightforward on the first quote, but total monthly cost depends on the items that surface later:

    Note: We annotate these items so you compare real monthly spend, not just a neat first quote.

    • Cross-connect recurring fees
    • Network billing model differences
    • Cooling and density restrictions
    • Remote hands minimums
    • Power overage billing
    • After-hours rates
    • Install charges

    Is Minnesota a smart colo market?

    • Great fit if: you want a practical Upper Midwest market with Minneapolis-led supply, useful regional reach, and more commercial discipline than many larger metros.
    • Why buyers like it: Minnesota often works for production workloads, regional recovery strategies, and multi-market footprints that need Midwest reach without overspending for prestige.
    • Best comparison set: benchmark Minnesota against Chicago, Iowa, Michigan, and Dallas before you commit.

     

    What a good broker does (and doesn’t do):

    We show how 1U colocation, 20U-22U cabinets, full 40U deployments, private cages, and multi-rack footprints behave differently once network, density, and support charges are included.

     

    We do not force Minnesota if the deployment is commercially cleaner in Chicago, Iowa, or another Midwest market.

     

    We translate provider language into a real monthly comparison, including where Minnesota is strong, where Minneapolis carries the market, and where another metro may be the cleaner answer.

    Popular Providers Snapshot (Minnesota footprint)

    • Minneapolis-led operators: Usually the anchor of the search because that is where the state’s clearest commercial supply sits.
    • High-density capable facilities: Important when the project includes GPU, AI, or hotter-than-average rack profiles.
    • Comparison markets: We often benchmark Minnesota against Chicago, Iowa, Michigan, and Dallas to show where Minnesota wins and where it does not.

    We surface both well-known operators and harder-to-find regional options, then narrow them down by practical fit rather than branding alone.

    Minnesota Market Map: Where to Land & Why

    Minneapolis core

    Usually the center of gravity when buyers care about real Minnesota supply, practical Upper Midwest reach, and the state’s clearest commercial options.

    State-level alternatives

    Useful when the project wants Minnesota geography but still needs to compare the main Minneapolis-led footprint against broader in-state flexibility.

    Upper Midwest comparison markets

    Minnesota should be judged against nearby markets when budget, topology, and deployment timing matter as much as the state itself.

    Lower-cost benchmarks

    Some deployments keep Minnesota on the shortlist but choose another market when the same technical fit is available with better commercial terms.

    Minnesota Datacenter Market Conditions (2026-2027)

    Minnesota stays relevant because it combines Upper Midwest geography, practical economics, and a Minneapolis-led supply base that often performs better than buyers expect.

    Enterprise workloads still look for practical Upper Midwest markets with sensible regional reach

    GPU and AI projects continue to push harder on usable power, honest cooling language, and deployment realism

    Regional production and recovery strategies keep Minnesota on serious shortlists

    That mix keeps the market active across both cost-checked and region-driven buying cycles

    As a result:

    Power-rich capacity still deserves early validation

    Network structure and cross-connect policy can change the total monthly bill more than buyers expect

    Small footprints like 1U colocation or 20U-22U cabinets often need a different shortlist than larger 40U, private cage, or multi-rack deployments

    High-density buyers should verify cooling and usable kW early instead of relying on generic brochure language

    We track which Minnesota facilities:

    Have practical near-term power capacity

    Can deploy in reasonable timeframes

    Are flexible on terms or motivated to win business

    That visibility is difficult to get if you approach each operator separately.

    Who Uses Our Minnesota Colocation Service?

    Company type / industryTypical Minnesota use caseTypical scaleTypical densityWhat they care about most
    Enterprise IT teamsProduction infrastructure in a practical Upper Midwest market with solid regional reach5-40 racks6-15 kW/rackRedundancy, budget control, predictable operations
    AI / GPU teamsHigher-density infrastructure where cooling truth and usable kW matter more than brochure language4-20 racks12-30+ kW/rackCooling design, power clarity, all-in monthly economics
    SaaS / platform operatorsCore application infrastructure with sensible Upper Midwest positioning and commercial discipline4-25 racks6-12 kW/rackNetwork spend, support quality, expansion path
    MSPs / managed hostingCustomer-facing workloads that need a reliable regional market without paying for oversized metro prestige10-60 racks6-12 kW/rackMargin control, support responsiveness, room to grow
    Recovery / secondary site buyersUpper Midwest diversification, regional resiliency, or multi-market planning3-20 racks4-12 kW/rackDisaster profile, cost, operational simplicity
    Healthcare / regulated softwareOperational systems that benefit from disciplined operations, stable support, and practical geography5-25 racks6-12 kW/rackUptime, security posture, predictable support
    Web3 / distributed infraAlways-on infrastructure where balanced economics and regional fit matter more than brand-heavy metros4-30 racks8-20 kW/rackPower stability, remote hands response, cost discipline

    FAQ: Minnesota Colocation (Traditional + High-Density GPU / AI / HPC)

    How fast can I get Minnesota options without weeks of sales calls?

    If your requirements are clear, we can usually start with email-first quotes and only introduce calls once there are a couple of finalists worth pursuing.

    Is Minnesota mainly a Minneapolis-led market?

    In practice, yes. Most state-level Minnesota searches are really Minneapolis-led, but we still compare the state against nearby Midwest markets when broader context matters.

    Can you help with smaller deployments (2U-10U)?

    Yes. We can identify providers that will seriously quote smaller footprints instead of forcing oversized minimums.

    How fast can we deploy?

    Typical installs land in the 2-6 week range, depending on power, network, and whether the deployment is standard or higher density.

    Do brokers increase my price? Is QuoteColo free?

    In many colo deals, providers already budget for commissions. The practical benefit is that we normalize all-in cost and keep you from comparing incomplete quotes.

    Do you only work in Minnesota?

    No. We cover 500+ datacenters nationwide, but Minnesota is one of the markets buyers compare when they want an Upper Midwest option with disciplined economics.

    Can I place a single GPU rack in Minnesota (12-25 kW) without taking a whole suite?

    Sometimes, yes. The key is verifying usable kW, cooling class, and whether the facility will support your rack profile in writing.

    What info do you need to quote Minnesota colocation accurately, especially for high density?
    • Cabinet count + size (42U/45U/48U) and weight
    • Target usable kW per rack (and peak draw)
    • A/B required? (yes/no)
    • Cooling requirement (air/containment/RDHx/liquid-ready)
    • Network: port speed + billing model preference + estimated throughput
    • Number of cross-connects (carriers/cloud/private)
    • Timeline + contract term preference
    X